---
title: "Everlaw (Everlaw, Inc.)"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/software/everlaw"
type: "software_profile"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "everlaw"
vendor: "Everlaw, Inc."
category: "Legal-specific"
segment: "eDiscovery and litigation"
confidence: "high"
last_reviewed: "2026-09-20"
---

# Everlaw (Everlaw, Inc.)

> Cloud e-discovery, investigation and trial-preparation platform. Generative AI codes documents, answers questions over the hosted corpus and drafts from cited evidence in Storybuilder.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/software/everlaw  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-20

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

Plan covered: Everlaw cloud with Everlaw AI Assistant (Coding Suggestions, Deep Dive, Writing Assistant, Review Assistant, Transcript Q&A). Review Legal Holds, Public Records, FedRAMP/GovRAMP clouds and MCP connections to third-party AI separately.

## Capabilities

- eDiscovery document review
- Chronology building
- Document summarisation
- Transcription
- Translation
- Agentic workflows

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Deployment | SaaS |
| Hosting regions | Australia, United States, United Kingdom, European Union / EEA, Canada |
| Australian region | Yes |
| Model providers | OpenAI, Google, Amazon Web Services |
| Assurance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP Moderate (federal cloud), GovRAMP Moderate, HIPAA, Cyber Essentials Plus |
| Training on customer content | No |
| Retention | Customer Terms state Everlaw will not use Input or Output to train or fine-tune a generative AI model for general use. AI FAQ (12 August 2025) says LLMs do not store submitted data or responses. DPA: customer may delete or export during the term; after termination, a 30-day export grace period then deletion within a commercially reasonable time. DPA also permits de-identification/anonymisation of Customer Data for Everlaw's internal business purposes. |
| Integrations | Microsoft 365 collection, Google Workspace collection, Zoom collection, Anthropic Claude (MCP), Google Gemini, Harvey, Legora, Microsoft Copilot, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Thomson Reuters, AWS |
| Legal content coverage | Everlaw processes the firm's hosted case materials; it is not a licensed primary-law research database. |
| Pricing | Unlimited user licences; fees track platform usage (documents on the service). Some AI features (Deep Dive, batch Coding Suggestions, translation, custom extractions) consume credits. Public Records is an add-on. No list prices published. Subscriptions auto-renew unless 30 days' notice is given; fees may rise on 30 days' notice before a renewal term. |
| Australian presence | Yes. An Australian application host (app.everlaw.com.au) is linked from the site. The subprocessor list (16 September 2026) names Australia as an available AWS instance. AI FAQ: for clients outside EU/UK environments, Everlaw AI Assistant requests are sent to servers in the United States; Deep Dive uses a US vector database even for EU/UK clients. |
| Website | https://www.everlaw.com/ |

## What the research found

| Topic | Status | Finding | Open question | Sources |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Product and plan in scope | Public claim only | This profile covers the commercial Everlaw SaaS platform and Everlaw AI Assistant (Coding Suggestions, Deep Dive, Writing Assistant, Review Assistant, Transcript Q&A). Legal Holds and Public Records are separate SKUs. FedRAMP/GovRAMP clouds and MCP connections to Claude, Harvey, Gemini, Copilot or ChatGPT are different processing paths. | Confirm the Order Form instance (including Australia), which AI features and credit bundles are included, and whether MCP connectors or a government cloud will be enabled. | [Everlaw — product](https://www.everlaw.com/product/); [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/); [Everlaw AI Assistant product page](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai-assistant/) |
| Deployment and instance choice | Public claim only | The DPA lets the customer choose among Everlaw's available AWS instances (United States, United Kingdom, EU/Germany, Canada, Australia). The same DPA says Everlaw may still transfer Customer Data to the US and anywhere its subprocessors operate. The platform is SaaS; no on-premises product was described on the pages reviewed. | Will our production instance be the Australia AWS region, and which processing still leaves that region for support, AI, monitoring or disaster recovery? | [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/); [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/) |
| AI and review features | Public claim only | Pricing and product pages list predictive coding, clustering, Coding Suggestions, Deep Dive natural-language Q&A over documents and transcripts, Writing Assistant, Review Assistant, transcription, machine translation and Storybuilder timelines/fact management. Some AI actions consume credits; single-document Coding Suggestions, translation and extractions are listed as no-credit. | Which of these features will be on by default in our tenancy, which require an Everlaw AI contract, and what credit rates apply to batch jobs? | [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/); [Everlaw AI Assistant product page](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai-assistant/); [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/) |
| Australian instance versus AI processing | Public claim only | Australia is an available AWS storage/processing instance. The AI Assistant FAQ (12 August 2025) states that for clients not on EU or UK environments, each AI request is sent to servers in the United States, and Deep Dive uses a third-party vector database in the US even for EU/UK clients. An Australian instance therefore does not by itself keep generative-AI inference onshore. | For an Australia instance with Everlaw AI enabled, map storage, inference, Pinecone, OpenAI/Google, backups and support access by country, in the Order Form. | [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Pricing, credits and renewal | Public claim only | Customer Terms: documents remaining on the service in a calendar month count toward Platform Usage; unpaid trials can be terminated at Everlaw's discretion; subscriptions auto-renew unless a party gives 30 days' written notice; Everlaw may increase or add fees on 30 days' notice before a renewal term. Pricing page: unlimited user licences; selected AI features use credits. No public unit price. | Provide an itemised quote for our expected volume and AI credits, year-one and year-two totals, overage rates, auto-renewal and any cap on renewal uplifts. | [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/); [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/) |
| Connectors, MCP and identity | Public claim only | Native collection from Microsoft 365, Zoom and Google Workspace is listed. MCP/API integrations are marketed for Claude, Gemini, Harvey, Legora, Microsoft Copilot, OpenAI and Thomson Reuters. Security pages state MFA and SSO support. SCIM and a native Word/Outlook drafting add-in were not documented on the pages reviewed. | Demonstrate SSO (SAML/OIDC) with our identity provider, any SCIM option, and the exact scopes of M365 collection and each MCP connector we would enable. | [Everlaw integrations](https://www.everlaw.com/integrations/); [Everlaw trust — security](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/security/); [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/) |
| Support and training | Public claim only | Pricing includes onboarding, online customer training and support. A Zendesk subprocessor applies if the customer attaches case data to support tickets. No public severity matrix or Australian-hours SLA was found. | What are contractual severity definitions, response times in AEST/AEDT, and the security-incident reporting address besides privacy@everlaw.com? | [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/); [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/) |
| Coding Suggestions evaluation | Public claim only | A September 2024 Everlaw report on Coding Suggestions versus first-level human review on 7,737 documents from four real matters reported aggregate precision 0.67 and recall 0.89 at yes/soft-yes cutoffs, and a 36 percent recall advantage versus humans on one second-pass set (0.82 versus 0.60). The study is vendor-run, not an Australian-matter independent benchmark. | Will you run Coding Suggestions and Deep Dive on a de-identified sample of our documents against a gold standard we mark, and disclose error types after model or prompt changes? | [GenAI document review surpasses human performance (19 September 2024)](https://www.everlaw.com/blog/ai-and-automation/genai-document-review-surpasses-human-performance-on-real-world-litigation/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs) |
| Review, chronology and drafting tasks | Public claim only | AI Assistant is built for first-pass coding, natural-language questions over the corpus with quoted sources (Deep Dive), transcript Q&A, and Writing Assistant inside Storybuilder Drafts. Terms require independent evaluation of Output, including human review, before relying on or publishing it. LLMs are described as probabilistic and capable of inaccurate statements. | Which of our repeat review, privilege, chronology and draft-narrative tasks will use Everlaw AI, and which remain out of scope (affidavits, advice, filings citing authority)? | [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/); [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/) |
| Client and OCG restrictions | Not confirmed | Everlaw holds case materials that are typically confidential and privileged. Project-level sharing of Drafts is documented. No published control that technically excludes a client who has banned generative AI was found. DPA requires the customer to have notices and consents for processing. | Can we disable Everlaw AI at project or client level, and what description of AWS region, OpenAI/Google/Pinecone and US inference can we give clients? | [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/) |
| Model and AI subprocessors | Public claim only | The 16 September 2026 subprocessor list names Amazon Web Services (cloud and AI), Google LLC (cloud and AI; US, or EU for UK/EU instances), OpenAI, L.L.C. (US, or EU for UK/EU instances) and Pinecone Systems (vector search, United States). Everlaw selects models; customers do not pin a named model on the public pages. | Which OpenAI and Google models, Azure/AWS/Vertex endpoints and Pinecone project will process our Australia instance, and can we refuse a provider? | [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs) |
| Published subprocessor list and notice | Public claim only | A dated list (16 September 2026) with archive PDFs names AWS, Google, Zendesk, OpenAI, Pinecone, Datadog and Everlaw affiliates. Security/EDR tools are omitted unless requested at privacy@everlaw.com. DPA: 10 days' advance notice of additions/replacements; customer may object in 15 days on data-protection grounds, after which Everlaw may decline the subprocessor for that customer or allow termination of the affected service. | Confirm the list covering our instance including security tools, and that the 10-day notice and 15-day objection rights apply without a narrower Order Form. | [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/); [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Training on customer content | Public claim only | Customer Terms (Everlaw AI Assistant): Everlaw will not use Input or Output to train or fine-tune a generative AI model for general use through the Service. The AI FAQ states data submitted and responses are not used to fine-tune or improve any LLM, are not stored by the LLMs, and are not used to train models across customers. The qualifier 'for general use' and the DPA permission to de-identify Customer Data for internal business purposes should be read together. | Confirm in the signed agreement that prompts, uploads, outputs, embeddings and de-identified derivatives are not used to train or evaluate any Everlaw or provider model, including 'internal' models. | [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Feedback and service improvement | Public claim only | DPA instructs Everlaw to process Customer Data to provide, maintain and improve the Service, and permits de-identification/anonymisation for internal business purposes. Beta features may be used to collect Feedback. The no-training clause is limited to generative models 'for general use'. Whether reviewer corrections train ranking or evaluation sets is not spelled out. | Are coding corrections, Deep Dive ratings and support tickets used to improve Everlaw AI, and can that use be switched off? | [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/); [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/) |
| LLM zero retention versus platform storage | Public claim only | Trust AI and the FAQ advertise zero retention at the LLM: providers do not store submitted data or responses. Case materials, Drafts, logs and Datadog monitoring remain on Everlaw/AWS for the life of the project. Pinecone holds vectors for Deep Dive in the United States. No numbered abuse-monitoring window at OpenAI/Google is published beyond the FAQ's 'do not store' statement. | Provide a class-by-class retention schedule (documents, prompts, outputs, embeddings, audit logs, backups, Pinecone, Datadog) for our Australia instance, including provider abuse-monitoring exceptions. | [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw trust — responsible AI](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/ai/); [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/) |
| Deletion during the term and on exit | Public claim only | DPA section 6: the customer may delete or export Customer Data during the subscription (that deletion is an instruction to Everlaw). On termination, Customer Data is to be deleted, with a 30-day export grace period, then deletion within a commercially reasonable timeframe except where law requires retention. Backup-purge lag and certified deletion are not specified. | What is the maximum number of days to purge primary stores, Pinecone indexes, backups and subprocessors after a matter-level or termination instruction, and will you certify deletion? | [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Support and employee access | Public claim only | Security page: employees who need customer data for support must follow an access-control procedure with verification of the customer request, necessity evaluation, RBAC, MFA and audit logs of requests and approvals. Zendesk receives case data only if the customer attaches it to a ticket. Legal-process notification before disclosure is not detailed on the security page (a government-request transparency report exists separately). | Is support access per-ticket with our approval, logged to us, and will you notify us of legal process seeking Case Materials unless prohibited? | [Everlaw trust — security](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/security/); [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/) |
| SSO, MFA and project permissions | Public claim only | Security page lists MFA, SSO and granular user management. DPA Security Measures describe RBAC and MFA. Storybuilder Drafts can be shared with a subset of project users. Query-time enforcement of project permissions for Deep Dive/MCP, and SCIM deprovisioning, were not demonstrated in the public docs reviewed. | Demonstrate SSO-only login, immediate session revocation, project-permission enforcement on Deep Dive and MCP, and any SCIM option. | [Everlaw trust — security](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/security/); [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/); [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/) |
| Encryption in transit and at rest | Public claim only | DPA Schedule 3 and the security page: HTTPS with TLS 1.2 or higher in transit; AES-256 at rest via AWS default encryption and additional AES-256; snapshots encrypted; hybrid techniques aligned with NIST SP 800-53. Customer-managed keys were not offered on the pages reviewed. | Confirm TLS 1.2+ and AES-256 cover documents, Drafts, embeddings, logs, backups and the OpenAI/Google/Pinecone links, and whether CMK is available in Australia. | [Everlaw trust — security](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/security/); [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Independent assurance | Public claim only | Security page lists SOC 2 Type 2 (security, availability, confidentiality, privacy), SOC 3 (2026 report downloadable), FedRAMP Moderate for the federal cloud, GovRAMP Moderate, HIPAA, Cyber Essentials Plus, ISO 27001, ISO 27017 and ISO 27018. Full SOC 2 is in the trust portal. Scope covering Everlaw AI, OpenAI, Google and Pinecone, and ISO 42001, were not inspected. | Provide the current SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 artefacts under NDA with scope including Everlaw AI and named AI subprocessors, plus any ISO 42001 status. | [Everlaw trust — security](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/security/) |
| Customer Terms, DPA and AI liability | Public claim only | Customer Terms and a click-wrap DPA are public. Terms: Customer retains IP in Input and Output; Everlaw will not use them to train generative models for general use; Output is probabilistic and must be independently evaluated. Everlaw's IP indemnity expressly does not apply to Claims that Output from Everlaw AI Assistant infringes. DPA liability is aggregated with the Agreement caps. Governing law follows the Agreement (not stated as Australia on the public Terms). | Will you sign the public DPA without narrowing it, offer Australian law/forum, and an output IP indemnity or a higher cap for confidentiality/data breaches? | [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/); [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Cross-border transfers | Public claim only | DPA: customer chooses AWS instance, but Everlaw may transfer Customer Data to the US and other subprocessor locations; SCCs and Data Privacy Framework are used for EEA/UK/Swiss transfers. AI FAQ: non-EU/UK clients' AI requests go to the US; Deep Dive vectors process in the US for EU/UK as well. Australia is an AWS region, not an AI-inference guarantee. | For APP 8, list every overseas recipient of our Case Materials if we take the Australia instance with Everlaw AI, and which SCC/DPF module applies. | [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/) |
| Security incident notice | Public claim only | DPA: upon becoming aware of a verified Security Incident, Everlaw will notify the customer without undue delay, provide timely information, and take reasonable containment steps. The clock starts at a verified incident, not suspicion, and no hour limit is stated. A government-request transparency report is published separately. No public incident register was reviewed. | Will you contract for notice within 72 hours of discovering a suspected incident affecting our data, including subprocessors, with facts sufficient for a Notifiable Data Breaches assessment? | [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Service, model and price changes | Public claim only | Terms: Everlaw may update the Service; material reductions in functionality are notified by email to the customer and platform administrator. New subprocessors: 10 days' notice. Fees may increase on 30 days' notice before renewal. AI FAQ: Everlaw may engage new LLM subprocessors from time to time and will notify customers. No model-pin or per-output version identifier was found. | Will you notify us before changing the OpenAI/Google model or Pinecone region used for our instance, and can we test before the change becomes default? | [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) |
| Export window and deletion on termination | Public claim only | DPA: 30-day grace period after termination to export Customer Data, alone or with Everlaw support, then deletion of remaining Customer Data including copies within a commercially reasonable time except legal retention. Drafts can be exported from Storybuilder. Certified deletion and escrow are not described. | What formats cover documents, productions, Drafts, AI outputs and audit logs in the 30-day window, and when are backups and Pinecone indexes purged with a certificate? | [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/); [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/) |
| Collection connectors and MCP | Not confirmed | Cloud connectors for Microsoft 365, Zoom and Google Workspace ingest evidence into Everlaw. MCP/API integrations send or expose case materials to Claude, Gemini, Harvey, Legora, Copilot, OpenAI and Thomson Reuters. Each connector is a separate disclosure. Disabling a connector without vendor help was not documented. | List every connector we would enable, the identity used, what leaves Everlaw, and how we disable MCP in minutes without a ticket. | [Everlaw integrations](https://www.everlaw.com/integrations/); [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/) |
| Grounding versus open web | Public claim only | Deep Dive and Coding Suggestions are described as operating on case materials inside Everlaw, with quoted documents. Marketing positions Everlaw as the evidence layer so external AI 'comes to Everlaw'. No product-level open-web search for Case Materials was found. MCP-connected assistants may have their own web tools. | Confirm Deep Dive, Coding Suggestions and Writing Assistant cannot call the open web on our projects, and how MCP assistants are blocked from sending Case Materials to web search. | [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/) |
| MCP actions and credits | Not confirmed | Integrations and pricing describe Everlaw as an evidence layer that other AI tools search, analyse and act on. Batch AI actions consume credits. Per-action human approval for MCP tools (export, produce, delete, share) and a tenant kill switch were not specified on the pages reviewed. | Which MCP tools can send, produce, delete or share without a person confirming each action, and how do we freeze AI and connectors immediately? | [Everlaw integrations](https://www.everlaw.com/integrations/); [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/) |
| Required human validation of output | Public claim only | Customer Terms require the customer to independently evaluate Output for accuracy and appropriateness, including through human review, and to modify it before relying on, publishing or otherwise using it. The AI FAQ repeats that LLMs produce fluent text not guaranteed accurate statements. Deep Dive returns quoted source documents to support checking. Mandatory in-product approval gates before production are not described as a hard control. | Can we require named reviewer sign-off before Coding Suggestions, Deep Dive answers or Writing Assistant drafts are produced or exported, with an audit export? | [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/); [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs); [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/) |

## Notes

Could not verify: founded year, named Australian customers, SCIM, Word/Outlook add-in, numbered LLM abuse-monitoring window, CMK, ISO 42001, and whether Australia-instance AI inference can be pinned onshore. DPA incident notice is 'without undue delay' after a verified incident, not a 72-hour clock from suspicion. Do not treat app.everlaw.com.au as proof that Everlaw AI stays in Australia.

## Sources

- [Everlaw — product](https://www.everlaw.com/product/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [GenAI document review surpasses human performance (19 September 2024)](https://www.everlaw.com/blog/ai-and-automation/genai-document-review-surpasses-human-performance-on-real-world-litigation/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw trust — responsible AI](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/ai/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw AI suite](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw trust — security](https://www.everlaw.com/trust/security/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw Customer Data Processing Addendum](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-data-processing-addendum/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw list of subprocessors (16 September 2026)](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/list-of-subprocessors/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw AI Assistant product page](https://www.everlaw.com/product/everlaw-ai-assistant/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw AI Assistant FAQs (updated 12 August 2025)](https://support.everlaw.com/hc/en-us/articles/24676737486107-Everlaw-AI-Assistant-FAQs) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw Customer Terms of Service](https://www.everlaw.com/legal/customer-terms-of-service/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw platform pricing](https://www.everlaw.com/pricing/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Everlaw integrations](https://www.everlaw.com/integrations/) (checked 2026-09-20)

A product profile is research to support questions. It does not approve a product for any firm. Public product information supports questions; it does not approve a product for your firm. Verify the exact plan, settings and signed terms.