---
title: "Anti-doping case timeline record"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/precedents/sports-and-entertainment-law/adrv-timeline-record"
type: "precedent"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "a39-adrv-timeline-record"
area_id: "A39"
kind: "checklist"
ai_level: "green"
version: 1
task_ids: ["A39-B20261018-2"]
law_stated_as_at: "2026-10-22"
---

# Anti-doping case timeline record

> A timeline of the dates Sport Integrity Australia's anti-doping page tells an athlete to record: contact, any adverse analytical finding, a provisional suspension, and when legal advice was sought.…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/precedents/sports-and-entertainment-law/adrv-timeline-record  
Law stated as at: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

A timeline of the dates Sport Integrity Australia's anti-doping page tells an athlete to record: contact, any adverse analytical finding, a provisional suspension, and when legal advice was sought. It does not decide a violation.

## Key facts

- Kind: Checklist. Steps or checks to work through and tick off.
- Practice area: [Sports & Entertainment Law](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/sports-and-entertainment-law.md)
- Jurisdictions: Australia
- AI level: Green. The tool writes the first draft inside a template you have already tested. You check it. Without that test, first drafting starts at Yellow.
- Law stated as at: 2026-10-22
- Status: Maintained. Checked on 2026-10-22 against the authority it cites, for Australia.

## When to use it

Use when an athlete or support person has been contacted about a possible anti-doping rule violation and the dates need to be kept in one place. Do not use it as a response, a submission, or a list of the violations. The handbook and the page that names the 11 rules were not opened.

## Used for these tasks

- [Build the timeline and decision record for an athlete facing an anti-doping case](https://ailawframework.com/practice/sports-and-entertainment-law.md#A39-B20261018-2)

## How AI may be used

AI may enter the dates the person supplies for contact, a provisional suspension and a request for legal advice. It does not decide that a violation occurred or draft a response.

**AI may:**

- Enter the date Sport Integrity Australia made contact, and the date of any adverse analytical finding notice, if the person has that date
- Record whether the sport imposed a provisional suspension, the date, and a short note of the terms the person says they were given
- Record the date independent legal advice was sought
- Mark the handbook as a document to be read, without summarising it

**AI must not:**

- Must not name the 11 violations, or say that 7 of them apply to this person. That page was not opened
- Must not decide that a rule was broken, or predict a sanction
- Must not draft a submission, a response, or an explanation of a test
- Must not invent a deadline. The page says every case differs and the time varies

**The lawyer checks:**

- The dates were taken from the contact and the suspension notice, not from memory alone
- A provisional suspension is recorded as counting towards a final sanction only if the person complies with its terms, which is what the page says, and only as a note
- The handbook has been read before anyone describes the steps between an adverse analytical finding and a return to training
- No response is sent from this timeline

## Authorities

- [Sport Integrity Australia, Anti-doping rule violations (contact, sanctions, provisional suspension, and the handbook's span)](https://www.sportintegrity.gov.au/what-we-do/anti-doping/anti-doping-rule-violations)

## Full text and drafting notes

The full text and the drafting notes are not part of this public page. Signed-in firm accounts can read them at https://ailawframework.com/precedents/sports-and-entertainment-law/adrv-timeline-record and through the signed-in MCP connector https://ailawframework.com/mcp/firm.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*