---
title: "Objection notice about an intimate image"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/precedents/defamation-and-media-law/intimate-image-objection-notice"
type: "precedent"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "a33-intimate-image-objection-notice"
area_id: "A33"
kind: "notice"
ai_level: "yellow"
version: 1
task_ids: ["A33-B5-3"]
law_stated_as_at: "2026-10-22"
---

# Objection notice about an intimate image

> An objection notice to the eSafety Commissioner under the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) section 33, for a person depicted in an intimate image or for an authorised person.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/precedents/defamation-and-media-law/intimate-image-objection-notice  
Law stated as at: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

- Kind: Notice. A formal notice to serve or publish.
- Practice area: [Defamation & Media Law](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/defamation-and-media-law.md)
- Jurisdictions: Commonwealth
- AI level: Yellow. You and the tool draft together, with you directing. You check every statement you rely on.
- Law stated as at: 2026-10-22
- Status: Maintained. Checked on 2026-10-22 against the authority it cites, for Commonwealth.

## When to use it

Use when a depicted person, or a person who meets section 33(3), wants to object to the Commissioner about an intimate image provided on a service. Giving the notice is not itself a removal.

## Used for these tasks

- [Draft an eSafety removal-notice request for AI-generated intimate or defamatory imagery](https://ailawframework.com/practice/defamation-and-media-law/draft-an-esafety-removal-notice-request-for-ai-generated-intimate-or-def.md)

## How AI may be used

AI may complete the service, the date and the residence facts the principal supplies, and must not decide that the image is an intimate image or that it will be removed.

**AI may:**

- Insert the service name, the date the image was seen, and the residence or hosting fact the principal supplies
- Leave the image out of the notice and refer to it by the description the principal writes

**AI must not:**

- Must not decide that the image is an intimate image, or that the provision is not an exempt provision
- Must not say that giving the notice causes the image to be removed
- Must not invent a form number or a portal step
- Must not include a copy of the image in this starting point

**The lawyer checks:**

- The principal applies the definitions of intimate image, social media service, relevant electronic service, designated internet service, exempt provision and hosting service
- The giver is the depicted person, or an authorised person within section 33(3)
- An authorised person makes the declaration in subsection 33(4)
- The Commissioner's powers after a notice were not opened and are not described as a result of this notice

## Authorities

- [Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) s 33](https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/osa2021154/s33.html)

## Full text and drafting notes

The full text and the drafting notes are not part of this public page. Signed-in firm accounts can read them at https://ailawframework.com/precedents/defamation-and-media-law/intimate-image-objection-notice and through the signed-in MCP connector https://ailawframework.com/mcp/firm.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*