---
title: "Extract platform, app-store or marketplace terms against the ACCC digital-platform inquiry"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts/extract-platform-app-store-or-marketplace-terms-that-bind-the-client/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A24-T1-R13-CTH"
practice_area: "Technology, Media & Telecommunications / IT Contracts"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Extract platform, app-store or marketplace terms against the ACCC digital-platform inquiry

> Tabulate ranking, fee, termination, data and moderation terms with clause references, and gaps against the ACCC Digital Platform Services Inquiry recommendations named.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts/extract-platform-app-store-or-marketplace-terms-that-bind-the-client/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Technology, Media & Telecommunications / IT Contracts](https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | Tabulate ranking, fee, termination, data and moderation terms with clause references, and gaps against the ACCC Digital Platform Services Inquiry recommendations named. |
| What the lawyer must review | Check the proposed digital competition regime's status with Treasury and on aph.gov.au Get specialist input; the ACCC's 33 recommendations span competition, consumer, media, privacy Check the ACCC enforcement register for unfair-terms action |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Extract platform, app-store or marketplace terms that bind the client](https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts/extract-platform-app-store-or-marketplace-terms-that-bind-the-client.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer-led judgement**

The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.
- Restriction: The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
2. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
3. Check the specialist’s assumptions, qualifications and limits. Obtain the relevant expert or specialist review before relying on a technical conclusion.
4. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
5. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
6. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
7. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*