---
title: "Build a one-sided terms table under the ACL or the ASIC Act"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts/build-a-one-sided-terms-table-for-a-standard-form-technology-contract/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A24-T1-R3-CTH"
practice_area: "Technology, Media & Telecommunications / IT Contracts"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a one-sided terms table under the ACL or the ASIC Act

> Flag termination, variation, liability, auto-renewal and unilateral-change terms that may fail the three-limb unfair-terms test; cite clauses and draft issues.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts/build-a-one-sided-terms-table-for-a-standard-form-technology-contract/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Technology, Media & Telecommunications / IT Contracts](https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Flag termination, variation, liability, auto-renewal and unilateral-change terms that may fail the three-limb unfair-terms test; cite clauses and draft issues. |
| What the lawyer must review | Confirm the contract is standard form Confirm small business: under 100 staff or under AU$10M turnover; no value cap since Nov 2023 Check penalty: greatest of AU$50M, 3× benefit or 30% of adjusted turnover Check cases on AustLII Apply the ASIC Act, not the ACL, to financial services |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Build a one-sided terms table for a standard-form technology contract](https://ailawframework.com/practice/technology-media-and-telecommunications-it-contracts/build-a-one-sided-terms-table-for-a-standard-form-technology-contract.md) |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
2. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
3. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*