---
title: "Draft a private ruling application under s 359-10 of the TAA 1953"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/taxation/draft-a-private-or-product-ruling-application/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A26-T1-R5-CTH"
practice_area: "Taxation"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft a private ruling application under s 359-10 of the TAA 1953

> Draft the scheme description, facts, relevant tax laws and questions to be decided from the transaction papers.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/taxation/draft-a-private-or-product-ruling-application/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Taxation](https://ailawframework.com/practice/taxation.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft the scheme description, facts, relevant tax laws and questions to be decided from the transaction papers. |
| What the lawyer must review | Check the scheme matches the transaction, or protection is lost Check s 100A, Part IVA and Div 7A (note Bendel) Frame the question to bind the Commissioner Do not enter client data into an AI tool without consent (TPB(I) D62/2026) |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft a private or product ruling application](https://ailawframework.com/practice/taxation/draft-a-private-or-product-ruling-application.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
2. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
3. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
4. Review the original source set for relevant material absent from the output, including contrary evidence, qualifications and unresolved gaps.
5. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
6. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*