---
title: "Assess an AI-generated submission in an association dispute"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/strata-and-community-titles/assess-ai-generated-submissions-in-a-strata-dispute/united-states"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A47-B8-1-US"
practice_area: "Strata & Community Titles"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["US"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Assess an AI-generated submission in an association dispute

> Mark statements in the generated submission that the papers do not support, and list citations in the submission for the lawyer to open. Write no replacement submission.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/strata-and-community-titles/assess-ai-generated-submissions-in-a-strata-dispute/united-states  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Strata & Community Titles](https://ailawframework.com/practice/strata-and-community-titles.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Mark statements in the generated submission that the papers do not support, and list citations in the submission for the lawyer to open. Write no replacement submission. |
| What the lawyer must review | You decide whether any of it can be used, and you write anything that is filed or sent. Formal Opinion 512: uncritical reliance on generated text can fail Model Rule 1.1. A citation in the draft is not a source until you have opened it. Model Rule 1.6: do not put the dispute file back into a public tool to do the check. If the property is in California, the association-records rules in Civil Code § 5200 do not decide the merits of the dispute. |
| Written for | United States |
| Applies to | [Assess AI-generated submissions in a strata dispute](https://ailawframework.com/practice/strata-and-community-titles/assess-ai-generated-submissions-in-a-strata-dispute.md) |

## Checking plan

- What the AI does: Mark statements in the generated submission that the papers do not support, and list citations in the submission for the lawyer to open. Write no replacement submission.
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 22 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Notes

- The generated submission is not filed. The lawyer writes what is filed.
- A citation inside the draft is opened or deleted.

## Sources

- [ABA Formal Opinion 512, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (29 July 2024)](https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-512.pdf) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [ABA Model Rule 1.1, Comment 8](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_1_competence/comment_on_rule_1_1/) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [ABA Model Rule 1.6, Confidentiality of Information](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_6_confidentiality_of_information/) (checked 2026-10-22)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*