---
title: "Build a film or TV chain-of-title table for Screen Australia funding"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/sports-and-entertainment-law/build-a-film-or-tv-chain-of-title-table/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A39-T1-R9-AU"
practice_area: "Sports & Entertainment Law"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a film or TV chain-of-title table for Screen Australia funding

> From options, assignments and licences, list each right, document and missing link, and summarise Screen Australia or state agency funding-deed duties.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/sports-and-entertainment-law/build-a-film-or-tv-chain-of-title-table/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Sports & Entertainment Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/sports-and-entertainment-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From options, assignments and licences, list each right, document and missing link, and summarise Screen Australia or state agency funding-deed duties. |
| What the lawyer must review | Trace every executed assignment and check the funding deed Check offsets, which are exclusive: Location 30% ($20M minimum), PDV 30% ($500K) Check the Producer Offset: 40% feature or 30% other (changed in 2024) Check co-production treaties and AI content Check moral rights and classification |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Build a film or TV chain-of-title table](https://ailawframework.com/practice/sports-and-entertainment-law/build-a-film-or-tv-chain-of-title-table.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*