---
title: "Review the contract of sale and draft the buyer's issues report"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/residential-conveyancing-and-property/review-the-contract-of-sale-and-draft-the-buyer-s-issues-report"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A9-T1-R1"
practice_area: "Residential Conveyancing & Property"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Review the contract of sale and draft the buyer's issues report

> Extract special conditions, title notifications, encumbrances and onerous clauses into a buyer's report with clause references and a list of searches still needed.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/residential-conveyancing-and-property/review-the-contract-of-sale-and-draft-the-buyer-s-issues-report  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Residential Conveyancing & Property](https://ailawframework.com/practice/residential-conveyancing-and-property.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Extract special conditions, title notifications, encumbrances and onerous clauses into a buyer's report with clause references and a list of searches still needed. |
| What the lawyer must review | Advise on risk against the actual title, searches and client instructions Do not send a generated report as advice |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.
- Written for: QLD

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
2. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
3. Confirm that the wording reflects the client’s instructions and contains no unintended admission, concession or commitment. Check the recipient and tone.
4. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
5. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
6. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
7. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Sources

- [ARNECC: Right to deal guidance, Version 7](https://www.arnecc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/MPRGUI4.pdf) (checked 2026-09-16)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/residential-conveyancing-and-property/review-the-contract-of-sale-and-draft-the-buyer-s-issues-report/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*