---
title: "Screen an engineered-stone exposure against the prohibition and the compensation path"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/screen-an-engineered-stone-exposure-against-the-prohibition-and-the-comp"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-DD20261023-13"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-25"
---

# Screen an engineered-stone exposure against the prohibition and the compensation path

> In a firm-controlled tool, record the product, the work, the dates and the state, and set them beside the prohibition on the national page. The tool does not decide whether an offence was committed.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/screen-an-engineered-stone-exposure-against-the-prohibition-and-the-comp  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-25

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | In a firm-controlled tool, record the product, the work, the dates and the state, and set them beside the prohibition on the national page. The tool does not decide whether an offence was committed. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer decides whether the work was prohibited and which compensation path is open. The national page says implementation may vary. Confirm the state's regulation. Re-installation is within the model prohibition. Interim exemptions exist. Ask the regulator. Do not treat the model regulation as the text of the state's regulation. |
| Written for / versions | 3 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to the linked source and check for material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: In a firm-controlled tool, record the product, the work, the dates and the state, and set them beside the prohibition on the national page. The tool does not decide whether an offence was committed.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer decides whether the work was prohibited and which compensation path is open. The national page says implementation may vary. Confirm the state's regulation. Re-installation is within the model prohibition. Interim exemptions exist. Ask the regulator. Do not treat the model regulation as the text of the state's regulation.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Record the product form, the silica content if known, and whether resin is present, from a document.
2. Confirm the state regulation is marked as not opened.
3. Confirm re-installation is not marked as lawful. The page says to ask the regulator about the interim exemption.
4. Keep the compensation path separate from the prohibition.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.
- The national page says each jurisdiction implements the ban in its own laws, and that implementation may vary. The model text is not the state text.

## Sources

- [Safe Work Australia: engineered stone ban](https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/safety-topic/hazards/silica/engineered-stone-ban) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [SIRA insurer guidance GN 10.1 Dust diseases](https://www.sira.nsw.gov.au/workers-compensation-claims-guide/insurer-guidance/other-nsw-wc-schemes/gn-10.1-dust-diseases) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Advice to Practitioners No. 3 of 2024: Silicosis List abandoned](https://dustdiseasestribunal.nsw.gov.au/content/dam/dcj/ctsd/ddt/documents/practice-notes/Advice-to-Practitioners-No.-3-of-2024-Silicosis-List-Abandoned.pdf) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [WorkSafe Victoria: silicosis and similar occupational diseases, 2022 amendments](https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/changes-silicosis-and-similar-occupational-diseases-workplace-safety-legislation-and-other-matters) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [WorkSafe Victoria: new silica-related diseases now proclaimed](https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/new-silica-related-diseases-now-proclaimed) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) schedule 2](https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/cla2003161/sch2.html) (checked 2026-10-23)

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Product identification letter for an asbestos or engineered-stone claim](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/personal-injury-and-compensation/product-identification-letter-asbestos-stone.md) | Letter | Yellow | A letter asking an employer, occupier, supplier or manufacturer to identify an asbestos product or an engineered-stone benchtop, panel or slab from its records. |
| [Request to preserve employment, product and insurance records in a dust claim](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/personal-injury-and-compensation/letter-preserve-dust-employment-product-records.md) | Letter | Yellow | A request that an employer, occupier, supplier or manufacturer keep employment, site, product and workers compensation insurance records while a dust claim is investigated. |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [New South Wales](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/screen-an-engineered-stone-exposure-against-the-prohibition-and-the-comp/new-south-wales.md) | Yellow |
| [Victoria](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/screen-an-engineered-stone-exposure-against-the-prohibition-and-the-comp/victoria.md) | Yellow |
| [Queensland](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/screen-an-engineered-stone-exposure-against-the-prohibition-and-the-comp/queensland.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*