---
title: "Review a client's draft description of a personal-injury claim"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/review-a-client-s-ai-drafted-claim-description/united-states"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-B6-4-US"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["US"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Review a client's draft description of a personal-injury claim

> List each factual sentence in the client's draft and the record, if any, that mentions the same event. Mark a sentence with no record beside it. Write no replacement sentence for the draft.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/review-a-client-s-ai-drafted-claim-description/united-states  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | List each factual sentence in the client's draft and the record, if any, that mentions the same event. Mark a sentence with no record beside it. Write no replacement sentence for the draft. |
| What the lawyer must review | Formal Opinion 512 requires review of generative-tool output before it is relied on, including citations and analysis before a court submission. Model Rule 1.1 Comment 8 is the technology competence comment. If the description is later filed as a federal pleading, Rule 11 is the lawyer's certification of factual and legal contentions. You decide what is filed. |
| Written for | United States |
| Applies to | [Review a client's AI-drafted claim description](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/review-a-client-s-ai-drafted-claim-description.md) |

## Checking plan

- What the AI does: List each factual sentence in the client's draft and the record, if any, that mentions the same event. Mark a sentence with no record beside it. Write no replacement sentence for the draft.
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 22 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Notes

- A sentence with no record is a gap to ask about. It is not a reason for the tool to invent a record.
- The client's own draft is information relating to the representation under Model Rule 1.6. Keep it out of a public tool.

## Sources

- [ABA Formal Opinion 512, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (29 July 2024)](https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-512.pdf) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_11) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [ABA Model Rule 1.1, Comment (including Comment 8 on technology)](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_1_competence/comment_on_rule_1_1/) (checked 2026-10-22)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*