---
title: "Prepare a dust-disease chronology for the DDT NSW, ADRF Trust or Comcare asbestos claim"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/prepare-an-occupational-disease-or-dust-disease-file-chronology-and-issu/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-T1-R12-AU"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Prepare a dust-disease chronology for the DDT NSW, ADRF Trust or Comcare asbestos claim

> From employment, exposure and medical records, draft a cited chronology and issues list (disease category, defendants/trusts, limitation flags) under the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW), Workers Compensation…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/prepare-an-occupational-disease-or-dust-disease-file-chronology-and-issu/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From employment, exposure and medical records, draft a cited chronology and issues list (disease category, defendants/trusts, limitation flags) under the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW), Workers Compensation (Dust Diseases) Act 1942 (NSW) or ADRF Trust claims. |
| What the lawyer must review | Decide the pathway: statutory (Dust Diseases Care via icare), common law (DDT) or both; each affects the other Check the CRP category; malignant disease has a shorter, accelerated timetable Do not use the tool to advise on or calculate any Asbestos Claims Resolution Process step for malignant disease Confirm the trust (ADRF, BJCT, Hardie, Wunderlich) and its current procedures and eligibility Apply DDT limitation provisions, which differ from the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Check DDT heads of damage, which include some unavailable in workers compensation |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Prepare an occupational-disease or dust-disease file chronology and issues list](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/prepare-an-occupational-disease-or-dust-disease-file-chronology-and-issu.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and assembling provisional schedules. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
2. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*