---
title: "Organise chaotic PI evidence into a fact base"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/organise-chaotic-pi-evidence-into-a-fact-base"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-B6-1"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-10"
---

# Organise chaotic PI evidence into a fact base

> Extract facts from medical, payroll and correspondence records.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/organise-chaotic-pi-evidence-into-a-fact-base  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-10

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Extract facts from medical, payroll and correspondence records. |
| What the lawyer must review | Lawyer verifies each fact against source. |
| Written for / versions | Australia |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Extract facts from medical, payroll and correspondence records.
- What the lawyer does: Lawyer verifies each fact against source.
- Who reviews: Lawyer competent in the matter and the forum
- Basis: Planning guidance checked against the linked public sources on 10 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.
- Why: The traffic light follows the consequence of an error and how much of the output the lawyer must check before it is used.
- Written for: AU

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open the cited source and confirm it is the current instrument for this forum and this date.
2. Lawyer verifies each fact against source.
3. Compare the output with the source and the instructions, including material the output left out.
4. The responsible lawyer approves the exact output for its intended use, or sends it back.

## Notes

- Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.

## Practical guide

Jurisdiction: Australia

**Deliverable**: Organise chaotic PI evidence into a fact base

**Inputs**

- Lawyers Weekly: AI in PI law (Mary Technology)
- AI Legal Assistant: PI chronologies (vendor)
- The matter instructions and the documents the output will rely on.

**Example**: Stop before the result is filed, sent or relied on. Lawyer verifies each fact against source.

**Stop and escalate when**

- The cited source is not the instrument that applies to this forum or this date.
- The output states a fact, date, citation, figure or commitment that is not in the instructions or the source.
- The responsible lawyer has not approved the exact output for its intended use.

Checked 2026-10-10.

## Sources

- [Lawyers Weekly: AI in PI law (Mary Technology)](https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/sme-law/44051-ai-in-personal-injury-law-why-the-real-opportunity-lies-in-review-not-answers) (checked 2026-10-10)
- [AI Legal Assistant: PI chronologies (vendor)](https://legalassistant.au/ai-for-personal-injury-law/) (checked 2026-10-10)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*