---
title: "Draft written submissions for a Personal Injury Commission hearing"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/draft-written-submissions-for-a-personal-injury-commission-hearing"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-B15-4"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["NSW"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Draft written submissions for a Personal Injury Commission hearing

> Draft submissions from the evidence and the authorities the lawyer has opened.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/draft-written-submissions-for-a-personal-injury-commission-hearing  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft submissions from the evidence and the authorities the lawyer has opened. |
| What the lawyer must review | Verify in the body that citations exist, are accurate and are relevant. That verification must not be carried out by a generative AI tool. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Procedural Direction PIC13 paragraphs 18 and 19 require the author of written submissions prepared with generative AI to verify in the body that citations exist, are accurate and are relevant. That verification must not be carried out by a generative AI tool.

- What the AI does: Draft submissions from the evidence and the authorities the lawyer has opened.
- What the lawyer does: Verify in the body that citations exist, are accurate and are relevant. That verification must not be carried out by a generative AI tool.
- Basis: Checked against the linked public source on 10 October 2026.
- Written for: NSW

## Notes

- Forum: Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales. Document: Written submissions.
- Main AI risk: Procedural Direction PIC13 paragraphs 18 and 19 require the author of written submissions prepared with generative AI to verify in the body that citations exist, are accurate and are relevant. That verification must not be carried out by a generative AI tool.

## Sources

- [Personal Injury Commission: Procedural Direction PIC13](https://www.pi.nsw.gov.au/resources/procedural-directions/procedural-direction-pic13-use-of-generative-artificial-intelligence) (checked 2026-10-10)
- [Supreme Court of NSW: Practice Note SC Gen 23](https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Practice-and-Procedure/Practice-Notes/general/current/PN_SC_Gen_23.pdf) (checked 2026-10-10)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/draft-written-submissions-for-a-personal-injury-commission-hearing/united-states.md) | Red |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*