---
title: "Check the three resource principles in section 83 before any advice"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/check-a-public-authority-s-resources-protection-for-a-park-reserve-or-bu/victoria"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-PL20261023-3-VIC"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["VIC"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-25"
---

# Check the three resource principles in section 83 before any advice

> List the function the lawyer identifies, the resource material in the brief, and the section the other side has named. Do not write the advice on whether the protection applies.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/check-a-public-authority-s-resources-protection-for-a-park-reserve-or-bu/victoria  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-25

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | List the function the lawyer identifies, the resource material in the brief, and the section the other side has named. Do not write the advice on whether the protection applies. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer writes the advice. The tool only lists the function and the material. Confirm that section 83 is applied as three principles only. Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool, not a public one. ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. Decide if a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). |
| Written for | Victoria |
| Applies to | [Check a public authority's resources protection for a park, reserve or building](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/check-a-public-authority-s-resources-protection-for-a-park-reserve-or-bu.md) |

## Checking plan

**Verify against sources**

Section 83 states three principles. The opened text does not include a bar on challenging the general allocation of resources.

- What the AI does: List the function the lawyer identifies, the resource material in the brief, and the section the other side has named. Do not write the advice on whether the protection applies.
- What the lawyer does: Make the legal assessment, check the source material and authorise the output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Lawyer competent in this practice area
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 23 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. List the function the lawyer has identified and the resource material actually in the brief.
2. Set that material against the three section 83 principles: resources reasonably available, the broad range of activities, and compliance with general procedures and standards as evidence.
3. Do not add a sentence that the general allocation of resources is not open to challenge. The opened section does not say that.
4. Leave section 84 for the lawyer. Its text was not opened. The heading follows section 83 in the Act.

## Notes

- Section 84 is headed as the next section on the page that was opened. Its text was not opened. The lawyer reads it before treating section 83 as the whole answer. This is not a road or footpath non-feasance task.
- If this is filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Practice Note SC Gen 25, issued on 14 May 2026, calls for particular caution with affidavit material and expert reports, and says confidential information should not go into a public AI tool.

## Practical guide

Jurisdiction: Victoria. A claim against a public authority over a park, reserve or building, where section 83 is raised.

**Deliverable**: A list of the function, the resource material and the section named. The lawyer writes the advice.

**Inputs**

- The function the lawyer identifies
- Resource material in the brief
- The section the other side has named

**Example**: Illustrative example: The other side names section 83 and the brief has a budget page. The list records both. It does not say the allocation cannot be challenged, and it does not advise.

**Stop and escalate when**

- The question is road or footpath non-feasance.
- The tool is asked to write the advice.

Checked 2026-10-23.

## Sources

- [Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) section 83](https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/wa1958111/s83.html) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC Gen 25](https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/legal-resources/practice-notes/sc-gen-25-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-by-court-users) (checked 2026-10-23)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*