---
title: "Assemble the material for an urgent hearing while the plaintiff is gravely ill"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-material-for-an-urgent-hearing-while-the-plaintiff-is-grave"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-DD20261023-5"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-25"
---

# Assemble the material for an urgent hearing while the plaintiff is gravely ill

> In a firm-controlled tool, index the medical reports, the diagnosis dates and the lawyer's note of the plaintiff's condition, with a document reference for each row. The tool writes nothing that is filed.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-material-for-an-urgent-hearing-while-the-plaintiff-is-grave  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-25

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | In a firm-controlled tool, index the medical reports, the diagnosis dates and the lawyer's note of the plaintiff's condition, with a document reference for each row. The tool writes nothing that is filed. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer decides whether an urgent hearing is justified and writes the application. Do not put a day count in the index. The timetable document was not opened. Reports stay in the firm tool. ASCR r 9, APP 11 and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) apply. |
| Written for / versions | 2 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer-led judgement**

The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

- What the AI does: In a firm-controlled tool, index the medical reports, the diagnosis dates and the lawyer's note of the plaintiff's condition, with a document reference for each row. The tool writes nothing that is filed.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer decides whether an urgent hearing is justified and writes the application. Do not put a day count in the index. The timetable document was not opened. Reports stay in the firm tool. ASCR r 9, APP 11 and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) apply.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.
- Restriction: The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm every report in the index has a date and a document reference.
2. Confirm nothing generated is placed in the application or the evidence.
3. Confirm no day count from the unopened timetable is in the index.
4. In Queensland, confirm the note says no specialist dust list was found.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.
- Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC GEN 25 was issued and commences on 14 May 2026. Do not enter confidential or sensitive information into a public AI tool. Evidence must be in the person's own knowledge and words.
- Queensland courts say not to enter private, confidential, suppressed or privileged information into a public generative AI chatbot. For submissions, lawyers follow Supreme Court Practice Direction 5 of 2025 or District Court Practice Direction 12 of 2025. Those directions were not opened beyond the courts page.
- The Dust Diseases Tribunal practice-notes index opened on 23 October 2026 has no generative AI note. Do not treat a Supreme Court generative AI note as the Tribunal rule. Do not enter confidential information into a public tool.

## Sources

- [Dust Diseases Tribunal: case types and how they are prioritised](https://dustdiseasestribunal.nsw.gov.au/how-the-tribunal-works0/case-types-and-how-they-are-prioritised.html) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Dust Diseases Tribunal: the claims resolution process](https://dustdiseasestribunal.nsw.gov.au/the-claims-resolution-process.html) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Practice Note SC CL 3 Personal Injuries Litigation](https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/SC%20CL%203%20-%20Personal%20Injuries%20Litigation.pdf) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Supreme Court of Victoria Dust Diseases List](https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/common-law-division/specialist-lists/dust-diseases) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC GEN 25](https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/legal-resources/practice-notes/sc-gen-25-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-by-court-users) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Queensland courts: using generative AI](https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/going-to-court/prepare-for-court/representing-yourself/using-generative-ai) (checked 2026-10-23)

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Outline notice of motion to take a gravely ill plaintiff's evidence early](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/personal-injury-and-compensation/notice-early-evidence-gravely-ill-plaintiff.md) | Court document | Red | An outline notice of motion in the Dust Diseases Tribunal to remove an asbestos claim from the usual claims process and to take the plaintiff's evidence under section 24. |
| [Request for an urgent hearing where the plaintiff is gravely ill](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/personal-injury-and-compensation/urgent-hearing-gravely-ill-plaintiff.md) | Letter | Yellow | A letter asking for an urgent hearing where the plaintiff is gravely ill. The New South Wales variant is addressed to the Dust Diseases Tribunal, and Victoria and Queensland ask the registry for the… |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [New South Wales](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-material-for-an-urgent-hearing-while-the-plaintiff-is-grave/new-south-wales.md) | Red |
| [Victoria](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-material-for-an-urgent-hearing-while-the-plaintiff-is-grave/victoria.md) | Red |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*