---
title: "Assemble the issues list for an early prospects advice"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-issues-list-for-an-early-prospects-advice"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A21-IN20261023-11"
practice_area: "Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-25"
---

# Assemble the issues list for an early prospects advice

> The tool lists open questions on liability, scheme, injury, time and missing evidence, and ties each question to a document or note already in the file.…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-issues-list-for-an-early-prospects-advice  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-25

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Personal Injury & Compensation (workers compensation, CTP/TAC, medical negligence)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | The tool lists open questions on liability, scheme, injury, time and missing evidence, and ties each question to a document or note already in the file. It writes none of the advice, and none of any letter the client receives. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer writes the prospects advice. The tool writes none of it. The lawyer decides which questions are real and which file source they rest on. Check ASCR r 9, APP 11, and whether a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). |
| Written for / versions | 3 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer-led judgement**

The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

- What the AI does: The tool lists open questions on liability, scheme, injury, time and missing evidence, and ties each question to a document or note already in the file. It writes none of the advice, and none of any letter the client receives.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer writes the prospects advice. The tool writes none of it. The lawyer decides which questions are real and which file source they rest on. Check ASCR r 9, APP 11, and whether a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.
- Restriction: The lawyer writes the prospects advice. The tool lists open questions only and writes nothing the client receives.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm each open question cites a file note or document, and that the lawyer can find it.
2. Confirm the tool has written no sentence of the advice and no letter to the client.
3. The lawyer decides which questions are real before any advice is given.
4. Confirm the list was prepared in a firm-controlled tool.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.
- Health and client information stays in a firm-controlled tool. A public tool is not used.
- Paragraphs 15 to 23 of practice note SC Gen 23 were not read in full. Paragraph 20 was not stated.

## Sources

- [Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW consolidation), r 7](https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_reg/lpulascr2015658/s2.7.html) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Supreme Court of Victoria: practice note SC Gen 25](https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/legal-resources/practice-notes/sc-gen-25-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-by-court-users) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Supreme Court of NSW: practice note SC Gen 23](https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Practice-and-Procedure/Practice-Notes/general/current/PN_SC_Gen_23.pdf) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Queensland courts: using generative AI](https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/going-to-court/prepare-for-court/representing-yourself/using-generative-ai) (checked 2026-10-23)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [Victoria](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-issues-list-for-an-early-prospects-advice/victoria.md) | Red |
| [New South Wales](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-issues-list-for-an-early-prospects-advice/new-south-wales.md) | Red |
| [Queensland](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation/assemble-the-issues-list-for-an-early-prospects-advice/queensland.md) | Red |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*