---
title: "Build a fundraising-licence matrix for the states and territories in the campaign"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations/build-a-multi-jurisdiction-fundraising-licence-matrix/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A35-T1-R7-AU"
practice_area: "Not-for-Profit, Charities & Associations"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a fundraising-licence matrix for the states and territories in the campaign

> List licence or exemption paths in each state and territory, including online fundraising, against the National Fundraising Principles and named state rules.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations/build-a-multi-jurisdiction-fundraising-licence-matrix/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Not-for-Profit, Charities & Associations](https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | List licence or exemption paths in each state and territory, including online fundraising, against the National Fundraising Principles and named state rules. |
| What the lawyer must review | Verify each place at the advice date Check NSW (from 1 April 2026) and WA recognition of ACNC registration Check adoption of the Principles and available exemptions Check Qld, ACT, NT and Tas rules Treat the output as a starting framework only |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Build a multi-jurisdiction fundraising-licence matrix](https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations/build-a-multi-jurisdiction-fundraising-licence-matrix.md) |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes organising research leads and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
2. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*