---
title: "Build a charitable-purpose table under s 5 of the Charities Act 2013 (Cth)"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations/build-a-charitable-purpose-and-public-benefit-table/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A35-T1-R1-CTH"
practice_area: "Not-for-Profit, Charities & Associations"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a charitable-purpose table under s 5 of the Charities Act 2013 (Cth)

> From the proposed objects, map each purpose to the s 5 charity heads and list activities that may be disqualifying under s 11.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations/build-a-charitable-purpose-and-public-benefit-table/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Not-for-Profit, Charities & Associations](https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From the proposed objects, map each purpose to the s 5 charity heads and list activities that may be disqualifying under s 11. |
| What the lawyer must review | Check the s 5 head, reading s 12(1)(l) narrowly Check s 11 disqualifying purposes Check PBI direct relief (Equality Australia [2024] FCAFC 115; July 2025 ACNC statement) Verify every case cited |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Build a charitable-purpose and public-benefit table](https://ailawframework.com/practice/not-for-profit-charities-and-associations/build-a-charitable-purpose-and-public-benefit-table.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes organising research leads and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
2. Confirm the appropriate instructions, permissions and cultural context with the relevant people before using information or communicating the result.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*