---
title: "Reconcile restrictive practice use records with authorisations and monthly reports"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law/reconcile-restrictive-practice-use-records-with-authorisations-and-month"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A55-P20261018-7"
practice_area: "NDIS & Disability Law"
tier: "green"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Reconcile restrictive practice use records with authorisations and monthly reports

> From the implementing provider's use records, the authorisations and the monthly reports lodged with the Commission, match each use to an authorisation and a reported entry, and list uses with no authorisation or no…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law/reconcile-restrictive-practice-use-records-with-authorisations-and-month  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [NDIS & Disability Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Green: AI drafts, lawyer checks |
| How AI is used | From the implementing provider's use records, the authorisations and the monthly reports lodged with the Commission, match each use to an authorisation and a reported entry, and list uses with no authorisation or no report. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer decides whether any unmatched use was unauthorised, whether it must be reported as a reportable incident, and what the provider must correct. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: From the implementing provider's use records, the authorisations and the monthly reports lodged with the Commission, match each use to an authorisation and a reported entry, and list uses with no authorisation or no report.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer decides whether any unmatched use was unauthorised, whether it must be reported as a reportable incident, and what the provider must correct.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Check each use against the authorisation for the same person, practice and period.
2. Confirm the monthly reports were lodged in the portal that applies to the plan's lodgement date.
3. Confirm the lawyer, not the tool, decides whether an exception is a reportable incident.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Sources

- [NDIS Commission: Behaviour support and restrictive practices](https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/rules-and-standards/behaviour-support-and-restrictive-practices) (checked 2026-10-18)
- [NDIS Commission: Reportable incidents](https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/rules-and-standards/reportable-incidents-and-incident-management/reportable-incidents) (checked 2026-10-18)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law/reconcile-restrictive-practice-use-records-with-authorisations-and-month/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*