---
title: "Extract the terms of a proposal to resolve a disability dispute"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law/advise-a-participant-on-the-ndia-s-proposal-to-resolve-a-tribunal-review/united-states"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A55-P20261018-5-US"
practice_area: "NDIS & Disability Law"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["US"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Extract the terms of a proposal to resolve a disability dispute

> Copy the date, the amount or action, and the deadline printed on the proposal. Write no advice and no response.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law/advise-a-participant-on-the-ndia-s-proposal-to-resolve-a-tribunal-review/united-states  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [NDIS & Disability Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | Copy the date, the amount or action, and the deadline printed on the proposal. Write no advice and no response. |
| What the lawyer must review | Advice on whether to accept a proposal is written by the lawyer. Formal Opinion 512 requires verification of generative output, and Model Rule 1.1 requires competence. The forum is not an Australian tribunal and not an NDIS review. Section 12182 and section 794 are the disability statutes opened for this area. The lawyer decides whether either applies. No charge-filing deadline was opened, so none is stated. |
| Written for | United States |
| Applies to | [Advise a participant on the NDIA's proposal to resolve a tribunal review](https://ailawframework.com/practice/ndis-and-disability-law/advise-a-participant-on-the-ndia-s-proposal-to-resolve-a-tribunal-review.md) |

## Checking plan

- What the AI does: Copy the date, the amount or action, and the deadline printed on the proposal. Write no advice and no response.
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 22 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Notes

- The tool writes nothing the client is asked to accept and nothing that is filed.
- Do not put medical records into a public tool.

## Sources

- [ABA Formal Opinion 512, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (29 July 2024)](https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-512.pdf) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [ABA Model Rule 1.1, Competence](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_1_competence/) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [42 U.S.C. section 12182, Public accommodations](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/12182) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [29 U.S.C. section 794, Section 504](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/794) (checked 2026-10-22)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*