---
title: "Map cultural-heritage permit and consultation duties for a project"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/map-cultural-heritage-permit-and-consultation-duties-for-a-project"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A36-T1-R9"
practice_area: "Native Title & First Nations Legal Work"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Map cultural-heritage permit and consultation duties for a project

> From the project description and the search extracts, list heritage statutes, consultation bodies and permit paths the lawyer has named, with gaps marked.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/map-cultural-heritage-permit-and-consultation-duties-for-a-project  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Native Title & First Nations Legal Work](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From the project description and the search extracts, list heritage statutes, consultation bodies and permit paths the lawyer has named, with gaps marked. |
| What the lawyer must review | Confirm the current heritage Act for that place: the law is local and in flux Do not treat Indigenous title and heritage as the same duty |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm the appropriate instructions, permissions and cultural context with the relevant people before using information or communicating the result.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Cultural heritage duty of care assessment for a project: checklist and record (Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld) s 23 and the gazetted guidelines)](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/cultural-heritage-duty-of-care-checklist-qld.md) | Checklist | Red | Project checklist for a land user in Queensland: which activity category applies under the duty of care guidelines, the s 23(2) factors a court may consider, register and database searches, when to… |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/map-cultural-heritage-permit-and-consultation-duties-for-a-project/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*