---
title: "Draft an applicant-replacement or authorisation-challenge pack"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/draft-an-applicant-replacement-or-authorisation-challenge-pack"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A36-T1-R8"
practice_area: "Native Title & First Nations Legal Work"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-02"
---

# Draft an applicant-replacement or authorisation-challenge pack

> From the authorisation-meeting notice, attendance roll and minutes, the claim file and the existing applicants' authorisation material, tabulate each authorisation step against its date and source document, index the…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/draft-an-applicant-replacement-or-authorisation-challenge-pack  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-02

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Native Title & First Nations Legal Work](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From the authorisation-meeting notice, attendance roll and minutes, the claim file and the existing applicants' authorisation material, tabulate each authorisation step against its date and source document, index the exhibits to the supporting affidavits, and list the decision-making facts that still have no source. The tool writes no part of the application or the affidavits - no draft, no scaffold, no chronology offered as evidence, no suggested paragraphs - and may only check the pack against the court's form requirements and compare a draft the lawyer wrote with the minutes and the exhibits. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer drafts the application and the supporting affidavits, takes each deponent through their own account of the meeting and swears nothing the deponent has not said, then checks the tabulated steps and the exhibit index against the primary notice and minutes. The lawyer decides which decision-making process the group in fact used, whether the affidavits prove it, and whether the replacement or challenge is properly authorised for the whole claim group. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer-led judgement**

- What the AI does: Produce a checklist of statutory requirements and a first-draft supporting chronology from the meeting papers and the claim file.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [Commonwealth](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/draft-an-applicant-replacement-or-authorisation-challenge-pack/commonwealth.md) | Red |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*