---
title: "Build a native-title registration-test table under ss 190B–190C"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/build-a-registration-test-compliance-table-for-a-claim/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A36-T1-R12-CTH"
practice_area: "Native Title & First Nations Legal Work"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a native-title registration-test table under ss 190B–190C

> Produce a checklist of the s 190B and 190C registration-test conditions against the claim application, with missing connection or authorisation facts flagged.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/build-a-registration-test-compliance-table-for-a-claim/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Native Title & First Nations Legal Work](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Produce a checklist of the s 190B and 190C registration-test conditions against the claim application, with missing connection or authorisation facts flagged. |
| What the lawyer must review | Remember the Registrar's delegate decides on the claim's evidence Check ss 190B–190C in the current NTA Check the NNTT guidelines and recent Federal Court authority |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Build a registration-test compliance table for a claim](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/build-a-registration-test-compliance-table-for-a-claim.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer-led judgement**

The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes organising research leads and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.
- Restriction: The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
2. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
3. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
4. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
5. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
6. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*