---
title: "Build a future-act procedure table under the Native Title Act"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/build-a-project-notice-or-right-to-negotiate-procedure-table/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A36-T1-R6-CTH"
practice_area: "Native Title & First Nations Legal Work"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a future-act procedure table under the Native Title Act

> From the s 29 notice and the project description, list right-to-negotiate, expedited-procedure and objection steps and NNTT clocks, and draft an initial objection letter.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/build-a-project-notice-or-right-to-negotiate-procedure-table/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Native Title & First Nations Legal Work](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From the s 29 notice and the project description, list right-to-negotiate, expedited-procedure and objection steps and NNTT clocks, and draft an initial objection letter. |
| What the lawyer must review | Verify every NTA and NNTT deadline on the Federal Register Check for change after the ALRC future acts report (31 March 2026) Check the WA Mining Act 1978 and Qld Mineral Resources Act 1989 regimes |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Build a project-notice or right-to-negotiate procedure table](https://ailawframework.com/practice/native-title-and-first-nations-legal-work/build-a-project-notice-or-right-to-negotiate-procedure-table.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
2. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*