---
title: "Compare alleged facts against the MAC definition in the signed deal"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/mergers-and-acquisitions-private-equity/compare-alleged-facts-against-the-mac-definition-in-the-signed-deal"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A2-T1-R11"
practice_area: "Mergers & Acquisitions / Private Equity"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Compare alleged facts against the MAC definition in the signed deal

> Extract the MAC definition, carve-outs and notice mechanics, and table the alleged facts against each limb with document references.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/mergers-and-acquisitions-private-equity/compare-alleged-facts-against-the-mac-definition-in-the-signed-deal  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Mergers & Acquisitions / Private Equity](https://ailawframework.com/practice/mergers-and-acquisitions-private-equity.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | Extract the MAC definition, carve-outs and notice mechanics, and table the alleged facts against each limb with document references. |
| What the lawyer must review | Decide whether a MAC has occurred on the signed clause Treat the table as an aid only; the call is a legal and commercial judgment |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
2. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/mergers-and-acquisitions-private-equity/compare-alleged-facts-against-the-mac-definition-in-the-signed-deal/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*