---
title: "Build a wreck-removal and salvage table under the Navigation Act 2012"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport/build-a-wreck-removal-and-salvage-obligations-table/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A37-T1-R14-CTH"
practice_area: "Maritime, Shipping & Transport"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a wreck-removal and salvage table under the Navigation Act 2012

> From the casualty papers, list notification, AMSA direction and salvage-contract facts against the Navigation Act 2012.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport/build-a-wreck-removal-and-salvage-obligations-table/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Maritime, Shipping & Transport](https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From the casualty papers, list notification, AMSA direction and salvage-contract facts against the Navigation Act 2012. |
| What the lawyer must review | Treat wreck removal costs as not limitable after [2026] HCA 15 Confirm the position under the Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims Act 1989 (Cth) Check any AMSA direction Check the current LOF text and Nairobi Convention status |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Build a wreck-removal and salvage obligations table](https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport/build-a-wreck-removal-and-salvage-obligations-table.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
2. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
3. Verify dates, people and sequence against contemporaneous records. Preserve uncertainty and identify gaps or conflicting accounts.
4. Review the original source set for relevant material absent from the output, including contrary evidence, qualifications and unresolved gaps.
5. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
6. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
7. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*