---
title: "Build a cargo-claim time-bar and notice table"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport/build-a-cargo-claim-time-bar-and-notice-table"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A37-T1-R1"
practice_area: "Maritime, Shipping & Transport"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a cargo-claim time-bar and notice table

> From the contract, bill and correspondence, list notice and suit clocks, candidate applicable rules and missing documents.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport/build-a-cargo-claim-time-bar-and-notice-table  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Maritime, Shipping & Transport](https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From the contract, bill and correspondence, list notice and suit clocks, candidate applicable rules and missing documents. |
| What the lawyer must review | Confirm the regime that actually applies to the carriage Check if a one-year cargo clock is a condition precedent, not an ordinary limitation period |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
2. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [New Zealand](https://ailawframework.com/practice/maritime-shipping-and-transport/build-a-cargo-claim-time-bar-and-notice-table/new-zealand.md) | Red |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*