---
title: "Draft a trade mark goods and services specification for IP Australia"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/intellectual-property-patents-trade-marks-copyright-designs/draft-a-trade-mark-goods-and-services-specification/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A23-T1-R5-CTH"
practice_area: "Intellectual Property — Patents, Trade Marks, Copyright, Designs"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft a trade mark goods and services specification for IP Australia

> Draft a Nice Classification specification and filing instructions from the client's product list against IP Australia's accepted headings, noting terms too broad or narrow.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/intellectual-property-patents-trade-marks-copyright-designs/draft-a-trade-mark-goods-and-services-specification/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Intellectual Property — Patents, Trade Marks, Copyright, Designs](https://ailawframework.com/practice/intellectual-property-patents-trade-marks-copyright-designs.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft a Nice Classification specification and filing instructions from the client's product list against IP Australia's accepted headings, noting terms too broad or narrow. |
| What the lawyer must review | Check the specification is not so broad it risks non-use removal (Trade Marks Act 1995 s 92) Check it is not so narrow it misses actual use Check classification against IP Australia's current Goods and Services Acceptance Criteria Confirm the mark as filed matches the mark used or intended Confirm the applicant is the correct legal entity, not a trading name Check whether disclaimers are needed Confirm multi-class fees are allocated per class |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft a trade mark goods and services specification](https://ailawframework.com/practice/intellectual-property-patents-trade-marks-copyright-designs/draft-a-trade-mark-goods-and-services-specification.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*