---
title: "Prepare a chronology of demands and correspondence for a winding-up in the Supreme Court of New South Wales"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/prepare-a-chronology-of-demands-and-correspondence-for-a-winding-up-in-t"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A8-B15-3"
practice_area: "Insolvency, Restructuring & Bankruptcy"
tier: "green"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["NSW"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Prepare a chronology of demands and correspondence for a winding-up in the Supreme Court of New South Wales

> List dates of demands and letters from the file into a chronology.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/prepare-a-chronology-of-demands-and-correspondence-for-a-winding-up-in-t  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Insolvency, Restructuring & Bankruptcy](https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy.md) |
| Human involvement | Green: AI drafts, lawyer checks |
| How AI is used | List dates of demands and letters from the file into a chronology. |
| What the lawyer must review | Check every date against the file. If the chronology was prepared for the proceeding and is later annexed to an affidavit, paragraphs 13(b) and 15 apply to that annexure. Paragraph 14 says the paragraph 13(b) disclosure is not required where the annexure was not prepared for the proceeding. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

Practice Note SC Gen 23 paragraph 9B allows generative AI for a chronology, index or witness list in a Supreme Court of New South Wales proceeding. The lawyer still checks every date and document against the file. Paragraph 9A restricts suppressed material, subpoenaed material, material subject to a Harman obligation, and material under a statutory publication ban. If the chronology was prepared for the proceeding and is later annexed to an affidavit, paragraphs 13(b) and 15 apply to that annexure.

- What the AI does: List dates of demands and letters from the file into a chronology.
- What the lawyer does: Check every date against the file. If the chronology was prepared for the proceeding and is later annexed to an affidavit, paragraphs 13(b) and 15 apply to that annexure. Paragraph 14 says the paragraph 13(b) disclosure is not required where the annexure was not prepared for the proceeding.
- Basis: Checked against the linked public source on 10 October 2026.
- Written for: NSW

## Notes

- Forum: Supreme Court of New South Wales. Document: Chronology of demands and correspondence.
- Main AI risk: Practice Note SC Gen 23 paragraph 9B allows generative AI for a chronology, index or witness list in a Supreme Court of New South Wales proceeding. The lawyer still checks every date and document against the file. Paragraph 9A restricts suppressed material, subpoenaed material, material subject to a Harman obligation, and material under a statutory publication ban. If the chronology was prepared for the proceeding and is later annexed to an affidavit, paragraphs 13(b) and 15 apply to that annexure.

## Sources

- [Supreme Court of NSW: Practice Note SC Gen 23](https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Practice-and-Procedure/Practice-Notes/general/current/PN_SC_Gen_23.pdf) (checked 2026-10-10)
- [Corporations Act 2001](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A00818/latest) (checked 2026-10-10)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/prepare-a-chronology-of-demands-and-correspondence-for-a-winding-up-in-t/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*