---
title: "Draft written submissions for a winding-up hearing in the Supreme Court of New South Wales"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/draft-written-submissions-for-a-winding-up-hearing-in-the-supreme-court"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A8-B15-4"
practice_area: "Insolvency, Restructuring & Bankruptcy"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["NSW"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Draft written submissions for a winding-up hearing in the Supreme Court of New South Wales

> Draft submissions from the affidavits and the provisions the lawyer has opened.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/draft-written-submissions-for-a-winding-up-hearing-in-the-supreme-court  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Insolvency, Restructuring & Bankruptcy](https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft submissions from the affidavits and the provisions the lawyer has opened. |
| What the lawyer must review | Verify every citation in the body against the Corporations Act compilation or the authority. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

If generative AI is used in written submissions, Practice Note SC Gen 23 requires the author to verify in the body that citations, authorities and legislative references exist, are accurate and are relevant. That verification must not be done only by a generative AI tool.

- What the AI does: Draft submissions from the affidavits and the provisions the lawyer has opened.
- What the lawyer does: Verify every citation in the body against the Corporations Act compilation or the authority.
- Basis: Checked against the linked public source on 10 October 2026.
- Written for: NSW

## Notes

- Forum: Supreme Court of New South Wales. Document: Written submissions for a winding-up hearing.
- Main AI risk: If generative AI is used in written submissions, Practice Note SC Gen 23 requires the author to verify in the body that citations, authorities and legislative references exist, are accurate and are relevant. That verification must not be done only by a generative AI tool.

## Sources

- [Supreme Court of NSW: Practice Note SC Gen 23](https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Practice-and-Procedure/Practice-Notes/general/current/PN_SC_Gen_23.pdf) (checked 2026-10-10)
- [Corporations Act 2001](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A00818/latest) (checked 2026-10-10)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/draft-written-submissions-for-a-winding-up-hearing-in-the-supreme-court/united-states.md) | Red |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*