---
title: "Draft a deed of company arrangement from the term sheet"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/draft-a-deed-of-company-arrangement-or-comparable-restructuring-deed/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A8-T1-R4-CTH"
practice_area: "Insolvency, Restructuring & Bankruptcy"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft a deed of company arrangement from the term sheet

> Draft a DOCA from the term sheet (fund, moratorium, administrator role, waterfall), listing non-standard terms, PPSA priority carve-outs and related-party voting limits.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/draft-a-deed-of-company-arrangement-or-comparable-restructuring-deed/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Insolvency, Restructuring & Bankruptcy](https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft a DOCA from the term sheet (fund, moratorium, administrator role, waterfall), listing non-standard terms, PPSA priority carve-outs and related-party voting limits. |
| What the lawyer must review | Review every non-standard term Diarise the 15-business-day execution deadline Check priorities against a live PPSR search and employee priority (s 556) Check related-party voting (s 600A) and moratorium reach over non-consenting secured creditors Get tax advice on debt forgiveness |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft a deed of company arrangement or comparable restructuring deed](https://ailawframework.com/practice/insolvency-restructuring-and-bankruptcy/draft-a-deed-of-company-arrangement-or-comparable-restructuring-deed.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes extracting and organising information and preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
2. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
3. Check the specialist’s assumptions, qualifications and limits. Obtain the relevant expert or specialist review before relying on a technical conclusion.
4. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
5. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
6. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*