---
title: "Draft a skills-assessment cover letter and Engineers Australia competency narrative"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/immigration-and-migration-law/draft-a-skills-assessment-cover-letter-and-competency-narrative/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A30-T1-R3-CTH"
practice_area: "Immigration & Migration Law"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft a skills-assessment cover letter and Engineers Australia competency narrative

> Draft a cover letter and competency statement from the approved employment evidence. Invent no project detail; assessing bodies reject unsourced generated prose.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/immigration-and-migration-law/draft-a-skills-assessment-cover-letter-and-competency-narrative/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Immigration & Migration Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/immigration-and-migration-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft a cover letter and competency statement from the approved employment evidence. Invent no project detail; assessing bodies reject unsourced generated prose. |
| What the lawyer must review | Remember Engineers Australia screens for AI content; detection brings a 12–36 month ban Note detection is also reported to Home Affairs Back every competency and date with client documents Check the body's current checklist and fees Keep the CDR in the client's own voice |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft a skills-assessment cover letter and competency narrative](https://ailawframework.com/practice/immigration-and-migration-law/draft-a-skills-assessment-cover-letter-and-competency-narrative.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
2. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
3. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*