---
title: "Record the courts page limits, without a leave clause that was not opened"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/health-and-medical-law/record-the-generative-ai-limits-before-a-liability-expert-is-instructed/queensland"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A32-MN20261023-6-QLD"
practice_area: "Health & Medical Law"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["QLD"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-25"
---

# Record the courts page limits, without a leave clause that was not opened

> From the forum the lawyer has named, set out the limits on the Queensland Courts generative AI page: the user is responsible for accuracy, and private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/health-and-medical-law/record-the-generative-ai-limits-before-a-liability-expert-is-instructed/queensland  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-25

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Health & Medical Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/health-and-medical-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From the forum the lawyer has named, set out the limits on the Queensland Courts generative AI page: the user is responsible for accuracy, and private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Do not state a leave requirement. Do not draft the report or the instruction letter. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer decides the forum and what is said to the expert about generative AI. State the accuracy duty on the courts page. Do not invent a leave requirement. Keep health and wage records in a firm-controlled tool, not a public one. ASCR r 9 and APP 11 apply. Decide if a breach is notifiable under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). |
| Written for | Queensland |
| Applies to | [Record the generative AI limits before a liability expert is instructed](https://ailawframework.com/practice/health-and-medical-law/record-the-generative-ai-limits-before-a-liability-expert-is-instructed.md) |

## Checking plan

**Verify against sources**

The Queensland Courts page says the user is responsible for the accuracy of information relied on or provided to a court or tribunal, and that private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Practice directions are listed. Their text was not opened.

- What the AI does: From the forum the lawyer has named, set out the limits on the Queensland Courts generative AI page: the user is responsible for accuracy, and private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Do not state a leave requirement. Do not draft the report or the instruction letter.
- What the lawyer does: Make the legal assessment, check the source material and authorise the output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Lawyer competent in this practice area
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 23 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. State that the user is responsible for ensuring that information relied on or provided to the court or tribunal is accurate.
2. State that private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not be entered into a generative AI chatbot.
3. The page lists Supreme Court Practice Direction 5 of 2025, District Court Practice Direction 12 of 2025, Planning and Environment Court Practice Direction 7 of 2025, and Land Court Practice Direction 4 of 2025. Their text was not opened. Do not state their clauses.
4. Do not invent a leave requirement for an expert report. No such clause was opened.

## Notes

- The page also lists subparagraph 16(l) of Supreme Court Practice Direction 14 of 2024, which is about expert evidence in criminal proceedings. That PDF was not opened. It is not a treatment-claim clause.
- The Queensland Courts generative AI page says the user is responsible for accuracy of what is given to a court or tribunal, and that private, confidential, suppressed or legally privileged information must not go into a generative AI chatbot. Practice Direction 5 of 2025 is listed. Its text was not opened.

## Practical guide

Jurisdiction: Queensland. A note of the Queensland Courts generative AI page before a liability expert is instructed.

**Deliverable**: A short note of the limits on the courts page, used when the expert is instructed.

**Inputs**

- The forum the lawyer has named
- Whether an expert report is to be instructed

**Example**: Illustrative example: The lawyer has named the Supreme Court. The note records the accuracy duty and the confidentiality warning, and records that Practice Direction 5 of 2025 was listed and not opened. It states no leave rule.

**Stop and escalate when**

- The tool is asked to state a clause of a practice direction that was not opened.
- The tool is asked to draft the report or the instruction letter.

Checked 2026-10-23.

## Sources

- [Queensland Courts: Using generative AI](https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/going-to-court/prepare-for-court/representing-yourself/using-generative-ai) (checked 2026-10-23)
- [Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) section 22](https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/cla2003161/s22.html) (checked 2026-10-23)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*