---
title: "Draft evaluation criteria and a scoring sheet from the statement of requirements"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/government-procurement-and-tendering/draft-evaluation-criteria-and-a-scoring-sheet-from-the-statement-of-requ"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A50-A20260923-3"
practice_area: "Government Procurement & Tendering"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Draft evaluation criteria and a scoring sheet from the statement of requirements

> Produce a first-draft criteria and empty scoring sheet from the approved statement of requirements, with a list of criteria that are not in the statement.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/government-procurement-and-tendering/draft-evaluation-criteria-and-a-scoring-sheet-from-the-statement-of-requ  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Government Procurement & Tendering](https://ailawframework.com/practice/government-procurement-and-tendering.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Produce a first-draft criteria and empty scoring sheet from the approved statement of requirements, with a list of criteria that are not in the statement. |
| What the lawyer must review | Check criteria match those published in the approach to market Do not add criteria after it is published |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

Criteria must match those published in the approach to market. Nothing may be added after it is published.

- What the AI does: Produce a first-draft criteria and empty scoring sheet from the approved statement of requirements, with a list of criteria that are not in the statement.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
2. Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
3. The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.

## Sources

- [Harvey: The In-House Guide to AI for General Counsel, 23 June 2026](https://www.harvey.ai/blog/ai-for-general-counsel) (checked 2026-09-23)

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Tender evaluation plan and evaluation report outline](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/government-procurement-and-tendering/tender-evaluation-plan-and-report.md) | Form | Yellow | A tender evaluation plan for a Commonwealth procurement (committee, stages, compliance screen, published criteria and weightings, rating scale, value for money, clarifications, records), with the… |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/government-procurement-and-tendering/draft-evaluation-criteria-and-a-scoring-sheet-from-the-statement-of-requ/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*