---
title: "Map franchise online-channel clauses against ACCC guidance and CCA s 48"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/franchising-and-distribution/map-online-channel-and-territorial-overlap-clauses/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A34-T1-R13-CTH"
practice_area: "Franchising & Distribution"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Map franchise online-channel clauses against ACCC guidance and CCA s 48

> Extract e-commerce, marketplace and reserved-channel clauses from the agreement and manual into a conflict table, and flag resale price maintenance risk under CCA s 48.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/franchising-and-distribution/map-online-channel-and-territorial-overlap-clauses/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Franchising & Distribution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/franchising-and-distribution.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Extract e-commerce, marketplace and reserved-channel clauses from the agreement and manual into a conflict table, and flag resale price maintenance risk under CCA s 48. |
| What the lawyer must review | Treat resale price maintenance as per se illegal under CCA s 48 Do not apply overseas rule-of-reason analysis Check territorial limits for competition effects Check disclosure and current ACCC guidance |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Map online-channel and territorial-overlap clauses](https://ailawframework.com/practice/franchising-and-distribution/map-online-channel-and-territorial-overlap-clauses.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*