---
title: "Build a production log for an ASIC s 19 examination or s 30 notice"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/financial-services-regulation/build-a-production-log-for-a-regulator-examination-or-notice-to-produce/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A28-T1-R9-CTH"
practice_area: "Financial Services Regulation (AFSL/ASIC/credit)"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a production log for an ASIC s 19 examination or s 30 notice

> From the ASIC notice and the document set, list potentially responsive items, privilege candidates and a chronology for s 19 examination prep.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/financial-services-regulation/build-a-production-log-for-a-regulator-examination-or-notice-to-produce/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Financial Services Regulation (AFSL/ASIC/credit)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/financial-services-regulation.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From the ASIC notice and the document set, list potentially responsive items, privilege candidates and a chronology for s 19 examination prep. |
| What the lawyer must review | Review every document produced, every representation to ASIC and any undertaking yourself Remember false statements are offences (s 1308 Corporations Act) Use AI for sorting only, checked on a random sample Confirm each privilege claim yourself |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Build a production log for a regulator examination or notice to produce](https://ailawframework.com/practice/financial-services-regulation/build-a-production-log-for-a-regulator-examination-or-notice-to-produce.md) |

## Checking plan

**Line-by-line review**

Review the complete output at the level of each line, paragraph or clause; check facts, meaning and omissions.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
2. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
3. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*