---
title: "Screen native-title future-act, right-to-negotiate and ILUA process for the tenement"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining/screen-native-title-treaty-or-tribal-land-process-for-the-tenement/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A13-T1-R2-CTH"
practice_area: "Energy, Resources & Mining"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Screen native-title future-act, right-to-negotiate and ILUA process for the tenement

> From title and native-title searches, map Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) future-act pathways (right to negotiate or expedited procedure) and missing facts. Do not pick one.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining/screen-native-title-treaty-or-tribal-land-process-for-the-tenement/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Energy, Resources & Mining](https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From title and native-title searches, map Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) future-act pathways (right to negotiate or expedited procedure) and missing facts. Do not pick one. |
| What the lawyer must review | Decide the procedure yourself Confirm determinations or claims over the land by same-day NNTT NTV search Confirm the category: expedited procedure, right to negotiate, compulsory acquisition, infrastructure Confirm s 29 notice deadlines, which vary by jurisdiction and cannot be extended Use the Native Title (ILUAs) Regulations 2024 (Cth) for new ILUAs (from 1 October 2024; 1999 Regulations replaced) Check the ALRC final report (31 March 2026): impact-based categories, 18-month RTN, five-year moratorium |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Screen native-title, Treaty or tribal-land process for the tenement](https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining/screen-native-title-treaty-or-tribal-land-process-for-the-tenement.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
2. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*