---
title: "Build a tenement due-diligence table from registers, NativeTitleVision and EPBC history"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining/build-a-tenement-and-title-due-diligence-table-from-the-registers/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A13-T1-R1-AU"
practice_area: "Energy, Resources & Mining"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a tenement due-diligence table from registers, NativeTitleVision and EPBC history

> Collate register extracts, encumbrances, NNTT NativeTitleVision hits and EPBC or reform-Act referral history into a table of identifiers, dates, conditions and gaps.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining/build-a-tenement-and-title-due-diligence-table-from-the-registers/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Energy, Resources & Mining](https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Collate register extracts, encumbrances, NNTT NativeTitleVision hits and EPBC or reform-Act referral history into a table of identifiers, dates, conditions and gaps. |
| What the lawyer must review | Verify every identifier, date, area and condition on the state register on the day of the opinion Use the state system: WA Tengraph/MiST, QLD MMOL, SA SARIG Confirm referral status on the Environment Register and whether the Environment Protection Reform Act 2025 (Cth) applies Note Tranche 1 from 20 February 2026 and the National EPA from 1 July 2026 Run a same-day NNTT NTV search; the NNTT disclaims accuracy and searches can lag three working days Confirm right-to-negotiate status and s 31 or s 32 deadlines Check if the ALRC Future Acts final report (31 March 2026) is implemented (18-month RTN, management plans) |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Build a tenement and title due-diligence table from the registers](https://ailawframework.com/practice/energy-resources-and-mining/build-a-tenement-and-title-due-diligence-table-from-the-registers.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
2. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*