---
title: "Draft the enterprise agreement and a Better Off Overall Test comparison table"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/draft-the-enterprise-or-collective-agreement-and-a-better-off-comparison/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A14-T1-R5-CTH"
practice_area: "Employment & Workplace Relations (incl. WHS)"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft the enterprise agreement and a Better Off Overall Test comparison table

> Draft an enterprise agreement and a BOOT table comparing proposed rates with the applicable award, including penalties and allowances on sample rosters.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/draft-the-enterprise-or-collective-agreement-and-a-better-off-comparison/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Employment & Workplace Relations (incl. WHS)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | Draft an enterprise agreement and a BOOT table comparing proposed rates with the applicable award, including penalties and allowances on sample rosters. |
| What the lawyer must review | Remember BOOT failure is a ground to refuse approval (s.186(2)(d)) Run the BOOT yourself for each classification against the current award and all foreseeable rosters Check evening and weekend penalties, shift overtime cascades and NES entitlements Check allowances are preserved or offset Remember intentional underpayment carries criminal wage-theft exposure (Fair Work Act Pt 4-1A) Document the analysis and sign the statutory declarations the FWC requires |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft the enterprise or collective agreement and a better-off comparison table](https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/draft-the-enterprise-or-collective-agreement-and-a-better-off-comparison.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
2. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*