---
title: "Draft a psychosocial-hazard register against the model WHS Regulations 2023"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/draft-a-psychosocial-hazard-risk-register-from-the-workplace-materials/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A14-T1-R9-AU"
practice_area: "Employment & Workplace Relations (incl. WHS)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft a psychosocial-hazard register against the model WHS Regulations 2023

> From cleared policies, surveys and incident records, draft a hazard/control register mapped to the model WHS Regulations hazard types and the Safe Work Australia Model Code of Practice: Managing Psychosocial Hazards at…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/draft-a-psychosocial-hazard-risk-register-from-the-workplace-materials/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Employment & Workplace Relations (incl. WHS)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From cleared policies, surveys and incident records, draft a hazard/control register mapped to the model WHS Regulations hazard types and the Safe Work Australia Model Code of Practice: Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work. |
| What the lawyer must review | Confirm the jurisdiction; state rules can differ from the model Regulations Vic: apply the Occupational Health and Safety (Psychological Health) Regulations 2025 (Vic), from 1 December 2025 Confirm the Code: Commonwealth Code of Practice — Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work (December 2024) Note that Code is under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth); state codes differ Treat excessive AI monitoring, productivity tracking or algorithmic scheduling as a named hazard In NSW, check the Work Health and Safety Amendment (Digital Work Systems) Act 2026 (assented 18 February 2026) Note it requires PCBUs to assess AI, algorithm and automated allocation risks; consider the right to disconnect (s.333M) |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Draft a psychosocial-hazard risk register from the workplace materials](https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/draft-a-psychosocial-hazard-risk-register-from-the-workplace-materials.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm instructions and personal circumstances through appropriate direct engagement. Have the responsible lawyer assess safety, capacity or vulnerability concerns and escalation.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*