---
title: "Build a roster and classification comparison for a proposed change"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/build-a-roster-and-classification-comparison-for-a-proposed-change"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A14-A20260923-2"
practice_area: "Employment & Workplace Relations (incl. WHS)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Build a roster and classification comparison for a proposed change

> Compare current rosters, classifications and proposed new hours against the applicable instrument; list underpayment and consultation risks.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/build-a-roster-and-classification-comparison-for-a-proposed-change  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Employment & Workplace Relations (incl. WHS)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Compare current rosters, classifications and proposed new hours against the applicable instrument; list underpayment and consultation risks. |
| What the lawyer must review | Decide coverage and classification yourself Use the comparison only as an aid to reading the award or agreement |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

Coverage and classification are legal. The comparison is an aid to the award or agreement read.

- What the AI does: Compare current rosters, classifications and proposed new hours against the applicable instrument; list underpayment and consultation risks.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
2. Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
3. The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.

## Sources

- [ABA Law Technology Today: Using Generative AI in Contract Drafting](https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_practice/resources/law-technology-today/2025/using-generative-ai-in-contact-drafting/) (checked 2026-09-23)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/employment-and-workplace-relations/build-a-roster-and-classification-comparison-for-a-proposed-change/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*