---
title: "Assemble and deliver the actual publications before the first case management hearing"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/defamation-and-media-law/assemble-and-deliver-the-actual-publications-before-the-first-case-manag"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A33-F20261018-2"
practice_area: "Defamation & Media Law"
tier: "green"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Assemble and deliver the actual publications before the first case management hearing

> From the captures held, assemble each impugned publication in the form in which it was published (page, post, video or broadcast file), number each paragraph or segment for common reference, build an index, and diarise…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/defamation-and-media-law/assemble-and-deliver-the-actual-publications-before-the-first-case-manag  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Defamation & Media Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/defamation-and-media-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Green: AI drafts, lawyer checks |
| How AI is used | From the captures held, assemble each impugned publication in the form in which it was published (page, post, video or broadcast file), number each paragraph or segment for common reference, build an index, and diarise the delivery date for the Court and each respondent. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer confirms each item is the publication as published (not a later edit), that the set matches the publications pleaded, and that delivery is made to the Court and every respondent on time. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: From the captures held, assemble each impugned publication in the form in which it was published (page, post, video or broadcast file), number each paragraph or segment for common reference, build an index, and diarise the delivery date for the Court and each respondent.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer confirms each item is the publication as published (not a later edit), that the set matches the publications pleaded, and that delivery is made to the Court and every respondent on time.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Check each item against the capture metadata (URL, date, time) and the pleading.
2. Confirm video and audio files play in the form the judge will view them.
3. Confirm delivery to the Court and every respondent before the deadline.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Sources

- [Federal Court of Australia, Defamation Practice Note (DEF-1)](https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/law-and-practice/practice-documents/practice-notes/def-1) (checked 2026-10-18)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/defamation-and-media-law/assemble-and-deliver-the-actual-publications-before-the-first-case-manag/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*