---
title: "Draft particulars of a liquidated claim"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/debt-recovery-and-civil-enforcement/draft-particulars-of-a-liquidated-claim"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A46-R20260922-3"
practice_area: "Debt Recovery & Civil Enforcement"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft particulars of a liquidated claim

> Draft particulars of a liquidated claim from the contract, the ledger and the lawyer’s chosen court form.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/debt-recovery-and-civil-enforcement/draft-particulars-of-a-liquidated-claim  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Debt Recovery & Civil Enforcement](https://ailawframework.com/practice/debt-recovery-and-civil-enforcement.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft particulars of a liquidated claim from the contract, the ledger and the lawyer’s chosen court form. |
| What the lawyer must review | Read each particular against the source document Remove uninstructed facts and figures that do not reconcile |
| Written for / versions | — |

## Checking plan

**Line-by-line review**

Particulars follow the form of the court you have chosen. Every allegation needs a document or an instruction behind it.

- What the AI does: Draft particulars of a liquidated claim from the contract, the ledger and the lawyer’s chosen court form.
- What the lawyer does: Check each allegation against the contract and the account, and check the draft against the current form and rules of that court.
- Who reviews: Lawyer competent in the matter and the forum
- Basis: Planning guidance checked against the linked public sources on 22 September 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.
- Why: The traffic light follows the consequence of an error and how much of the output the lawyer must check before it is used.
- Written for: AU

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Use the current form for that court, including any online-filing fields.
2. Give each allegation a source: contract clause, invoice, statement or instruction.
3. Reconcile the total to the ledger after credits.
4. If the court requires a verification about citations or generative AI, follow that court’s note before filing.

## Notes

- Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.

## Practical guide

Jurisdiction: The Australian court whose form will be filed

**Deliverable**: Draft particulars mapped to the fields of the current court form.

**Inputs**

- The lawyer’s chosen court and form
- The contract and ledger
- Instructions on what is admitted and what is in dispute

**Example**: If the form asks for the agreement date, use the date on the signed contract, not the date of the first invoice, unless they are the same.

**Stop and escalate when**

- The court or the form has not been chosen.
- A material part of the debt is unliquidated or disputed and the draft still pleads a single sum.

Checked 2026-09-22.

## Sources

- [Federal Court of Australia Practice Note GPN-AI](https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/law-and-practice/practice-documents/practice-notes/gpn-ai) (checked 2026-09-22)
- [Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC Gen 25](https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/legal-resources/practice-notes/sc-gen-25-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-by-court-users) (checked 2026-09-22)
- [Supreme Court of New South Wales Practice Note SC Gen 23 (PDF, reissued 28 January 2025)](https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Practice-and-Procedure/Practice-Notes/general/current/PN_SC_Gen_23.pdf) (checked 2026-09-22)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*