---
title: "Draft agreed facts, a plea document or a request to particularise"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/criminal-law/draft-agreed-facts-a-plea-document-or-a-request-to-particularise"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A20-T1-R6"
practice_area: "Criminal Law"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Draft agreed facts, a plea document or a request to particularise

> From the charge and the brief, draft proposed agreed facts, a plea-indication note or a request for particulars, with a list of facts the client does not accept.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/criminal-law/draft-agreed-facts-a-plea-document-or-a-request-to-particularise  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Criminal Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/criminal-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From the charge and the brief, draft proposed agreed facts, a plea-indication note or a request for particulars, with a list of facts the client does not accept. |
| What the lawyer must review | Do not draft charging documents for the defence Read every line of agreed facts; they bind the client Make particulars requests yourself |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
2. Confirm that the wording reflects the client’s instructions and contains no unintended admission, concession or commitment. Check the recipient and tone.
3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/criminal-law/draft-agreed-facts-a-plea-document-or-a-request-to-particularise/united-states.md) | Red |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*