---
title: "Prepare a delay-and-quantum issues table from the experts' drafts"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/construction-and-infrastructure/prepare-a-delay-and-quantum-issues-table-from-the-experts-drafts"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A11-T1-R6"
practice_area: "Construction & Infrastructure"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Prepare a delay-and-quantum issues table from the experts' drafts

> From delay reports and cost files, table critical-path allegations, concurrent-delay arguments and quantum heads with document cites.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/construction-and-infrastructure/prepare-a-delay-and-quantum-issues-table-from-the-experts-drafts  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Construction & Infrastructure](https://ailawframework.com/practice/construction-and-infrastructure.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From delay reports and cost files, table critical-path allegations, concurrent-delay arguments and quantum heads with document cites. |
| What the lawyer must review | Decide causation and recoverable heads yourself Do not let a generated table become the expert's opinion |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
2. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
3. Check the specialist’s assumptions, qualifications and limits. Obtain the relevant expert or specialist review before relying on a technical conclusion.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/construction-and-infrastructure/prepare-a-delay-and-quantum-issues-table-from-the-experts-drafts/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*