---
title: "Screen exclusive-dealing and third-line forcing clauses under CCA s 47"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/screen-exclusive-dealing-and-conditional-supply-clauses/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A29-T1-R10-CTH"
practice_area: "Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Screen exclusive-dealing and third-line forcing clauses under CCA s 47

> List exclusive, tying and third-line conditions from the agreement with clause references and a note of the s 93 notification path.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/screen-exclusive-dealing-and-conditional-supply-clauses/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | List exclusive, tying and third-line conditions from the agreement with clause references and a note of the s 93 notification path. |
| What the lawyer must review | Apply the SLC test to third-line forcing and other exclusive dealing, as since 2017 (s 47(10)) Check notification, which is available for both Check 2026-27 digital-platform priorities and the $100m maximum from 28 March 2026 Consider authorisation |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Screen exclusive-dealing and conditional-supply clauses](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/screen-exclusive-dealing-and-conditional-supply-clauses.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes summarising source material and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
2. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*