---
title: "Draft a hold notice and document list for an ACCC s 155 investigation"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/draft-a-hold-notice-and-a-document-category-list-for-a-competition-inves/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A29-T1-R15-CTH"
practice_area: "Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft a hold notice and document list for an ACCC s 155 investigation

> Produce a litigation-hold notice and a schedule of document categories from the s 155 notice the lawyer supplies.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/draft-a-hold-notice-and-a-document-category-list-for-a-competition-inves/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Produce a litigation-hold notice and a schedule of document categories from the s 155 notice the lawyer supplies. |
| What the lawyer must review | Remember non-compliance is an offence Map categories to real repositories Flag privilege, including in-house (Daniels Corporation) Calendar the return date and advise on immunity before production Ring-fence staff messages Have the partner prepare s 155(1)(b) witnesses |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft a hold notice and a document-category list for a competition investigation](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/draft-a-hold-notice-and-a-document-category-list-for-a-competition-inves.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
2. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
3. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*