---
title: "Check displayed pricing and subscription flows under ACL ss 18, 29 and 48"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/check-displayed-pricing-subscriptions-and-cancellation-flows/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A29-T1-R8-CTH"
practice_area: "Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Check displayed pricing and subscription flows under ACL ss 18, 29 and 48

> From the screenshots or walk-through, list displayed prices, mandatory fees, subscription steps and cancellation paths, flagging omissions against ACL ss 18, 29 and 48.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/check-displayed-pricing-subscriptions-and-cancellation-flows/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From the screenshots or walk-through, list displayed prices, mandatory fees, subscription steps and cancellation paths, flagging omissions against ACL ss 18, 29 and 48. |
| What the lawyer must review | Remember drip pricing is already unlawful (ss 18, 29, 48) Do not treat the Unfair Trading Practices Bill 2026 as law until assent Note the Bill was introduced 1 April 2026, with a proposed start of 1 July 2027 Test the real checkout flow Check the ACCC 2026-27 dark-patterns priority |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Check displayed pricing, subscriptions and cancellation flows](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/check-displayed-pricing-subscriptions-and-cancellation-flows.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
2. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
3. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*