---
title: "Build a merger-notification threshold table under CCA Part IVA"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/build-a-merger-notification-threshold-table-from-the-deal-facts/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A29-T1-R4-CTH"
practice_area: "Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Build a merger-notification threshold table under CCA Part IVA

> Map the deal and financial facts to the ACCC notification-threshold matrix, list missing figures, and draft the acquisition description for the ACCC portal.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/build-a-merger-notification-threshold-table-from-the-deal-facts/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Competition & Consumer Law (ACCC / ACL)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Map the deal and financial facts to the ACCC notification-threshold matrix, list missing figures, and draft the acquisition description for the ACCC portal. |
| What the lawyer must review | Do not complete before clearance; it is a strict-liability breach (up to $100m from 28 March 2026) Check thresholds in the Notification of Acquisitions Determination 2025 Check the 1 April 2026 control tests and the three-year cumulative rule Check waiver ($8,300; 25 business days) and the standstill Apply Part IVA, not Part VII |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Build a merger-notification threshold table from the deal facts](https://ailawframework.com/practice/competition-and-consumer-law/build-a-merger-notification-threshold-table-from-the-deal-facts.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
2. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
3. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
4. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
5. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
6. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*